Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use
Shirin Heidari,
T. Babor,
P. De Castro,
S. Tort,
M. Curno
|
10 |
2016 |
10
2016
|
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles
C. Baethge,
S. Goldbeck-Wood,
S. Mertens
|
10 |
2019 |
10
2019
|
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
Jonathan P. Tennant,
Tony Ross-Hellauer
|
7 |
2019 |
7
2019
|
Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity
L. Bouter,
J. Tijdink,
N. Axelsen,
B. Martinson,
G. ter Riet
|
7 |
2016 |
7
2016
|
Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency
A. Dunn,
E. Coiera,
K. Mandl,
Florence T. Bourgeois
|
7 |
2016 |
7
2016
|
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review
Mohammad Hosseini,
S. Horbach
|
7 |
2023 |
7
2023
|
A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review
B. Aczél,
Barnabas Szaszi,
Alexander O Holcombe
|
7 |
2021 |
7
2021
|
Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews
Jennifer A. Byrne
|
6 |
2016 |
6
2016
|
What incentives increase data sharing in health and medical research? A systematic review
A. Rowhani-Farid,
Michelle Allen,
A. Barnett
|
6 |
2017 |
6
2017
|
A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)
61 auth.
Kaitlyn Hair,
M. Macleod,
E. Sena,
D. Howells,
P. Bath,
Cadi M. J. Irvine,
C. MacCallum,
G. Morrison,
Alejandra Clark,
Gina M. Alvino,
Michelle T. Dohm,
Jing Liao,
Chris Sena,
Rosie Moreland,
Fala Cramond,
...
Gillian L. Currie,
Zsanett Bahor,
Paula Grill,
Alexandra Bannach‐Brown,
Kaitlyn Hair,
Daniel-Cosmin Marcu,
S. Antar,
K. Blazek,
T. Konold,
Monica Dingwall,
Victoria Hohendorf,
M. Hosh,
Klara Gerlei,
K. Wever,
E. Sena,
Victor Jones,
T. Quinn,
N. Karp,
J. Freymann,
Anthony Shek,
Teja Gregorc,
A. Rinaldi,
Privjyot Jheeta,
Ahmed Nazzal,
D. Henshall,
Joanne Storey,
J. Baginskaite,
Cilene Lino de Oliveira,
K. Laban,
E. Charbonney,
Savannah A. Lynn,
M. Cascella,
E. Wheater,
Daniel Baker,
R. Cheyne,
E. Christopher,
P. Roncon,
Evandro A. De-Souza,
Mahmoud Warda,
Sarah-Jane Corke,
Z. Ammar,
L. O’Connor,
I. M. Devonshire,
S. McCann,
L. Gray,
Ezgi Tanriver Ayder
|
6 |
2019 |
6
2019
|
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
S. Horbach,
W. Halffman
|
6 |
2018 |
6
2018
|
Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature
21 auth.
C. F. D. Carneiro,
Victor G. S. Queiroz,
T. Moulin,
C. A. M. Carvalho,
C. Haas,
Danielle Rayêe,
D. Henshall,
Evandro A. De-Souza,
F. E. Amorim,
Flávia Boos,
...
G. Guercio,
Igor R. Costa,
K. Hajdu,
L. V. van Egmond,
M. Modrák,
Pedro B. Tan,
Richard J. Abdill,
S. Burgess,
Sylvia F. S. Guerra,
V. T. Bortoluzzi,
O. Amaral
|
6 |
2019 |
6
2019
|
