BetterScholar BetterScholar
Title Claps Level Year L/Y
Combined analysis of νμ disappearance and νμ→νe appearance in MINOS using accelerator and atmospheric neutrinos.
112 auth. P. Adamson, I. Anghel, A. Aurisano, G. Barr, M. Bishai, A. Blake, G. Bock, D. Bogert, S. Cao, C. Castromonte, D. Cherdack, S. Childress, J. Coelho, L. Corwin, D. Cronin-Hennessy, ... J. D. Jong, A. Devan, N. Devenish, M. Diwan, C. Escobar, J. Evans, E. Falk, G. J. Feldman, M. Frohne, H. Gallagher, R. Gomes, M. Goodman, P. Gouffon, N. Graf, R. Gran, K. Grzelak, A. Habig, S. Hahn, J. Hartnell, R. Hatcher, A. Himmel, A. Holin, J. Huang, J. Hylen, G. Irwin, Z. Isvan, C. James, D. Jensen, T. Kafka, S. Amcix, G. Koizumi, M. Kordosky, A. Kreymer, K. Lang, P. Litchfield, P. Lucas, W. Mann, M. Marshak, N. Mayer, C. Mcgivern, M. M. Medeiros, R. Mehdiyev, J. Meier, M. Messier, D. Michael, W. Miller, S. Mishra, S. M. Sher, C. Moore, L. Mualem, J. Musser, D. Naples, J. Nelson, H. Newman, R. Nichol, J. Nowak, J. O’Connor, M. Orchanian, R. Pahlka, J. Paley, R. Patterson, G. Pawloski, A. Perch, S. Phan-Budd, R. Plunkett, N. Poonthottathil, X. Qiu, A. Radovic, B. Rebel, C. Rosenfeld, H. Rubin, M. Sanchez, J. Schneps, A. Schreckenberger, P. Schreiner, R. Sharma, A. Sousa, N. Tagg, R. Talaga, J. Thomas, M. Thomson, X. Tian, A. Timmons, S. Tognini, R. Toner, D. Torretta, G. Tzanakos, J. Urheim, P. Vahle, B. Viren, A. Weber, R. Webb, C. White, L. Whitehead, L. Whitehead, S. Wojcicki, R. Zwaska
We report on a new analysis of neutrino oscillations in MINOS using the complete set of accelerator and atmospheric data. The analysis combines the ν(μ) disappearance and ν(e) appearance data using the three-flavor formalism. We measure |Δm(32)(2)| …
We report on a new analysis of neutrino oscillations in MINOS using the complete set of accelerator and atmospheric data. The analysis combines the ν(μ) disappearance and ν(e) appearance data using the three-flavor formalism. We measure |Δm(32)(2)| = [2.28-2.46] × 10(-3) eV(2) (68% C.L.) and sin(2)θ(23) = 0.35-0.65 (90% C.L.) in the normal hierarchy, and |Δm(32)(2)| = [2.32-2.53] × 10(-3) eV(2) (68% C.L.) and sin(2)θ(23) = 0.34-0.67 (90% C.L.) in the inverted hierarchy. The data also constrain δ(CP), the θ(23} octant degeneracy and the mass hierarchy; we disfavor 36% (11%) of this three-parameter space at 68% (90%) C.L.
Published in Physical Review Letters
271
 7 2014